The recent ruling by a Texas judge directing the FDA to stop the approval of an abortion pill, mifepristone, has sparked controversy and criticism from the Left, including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
She suggested ignoring the ruling, which has raised concerns about undermining the rule of law. While there are serious questions about the court’s decision, ignoring court rulings that politicians disagree with could be dangerous. The Biden Justice Department has appealed the decision, and the issue is headed to the highest court.
Takeaways:
A Texas judge directed the FDA to stop the approval of mifepristone while a lawsuit challenging its safety winds its way through the courts.
Democrats, including AOC and HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra, have criticized the ruling and suggested ignoring it, raising concerns about undermining the rule of law.
Republican Rep. Nancy Mace agreed with taking no action on the ruling, citing the need for compassion towards women.
There are serious questions about the court’s decision and how it could impact the ability of regulatory agencies to make well-grounded decisions.
The issue is headed for the highest court, and the authority of federal district judges to issue nationwide injunctions is being called into question.
Commentary:
The ruling by a Texas judge directing the FDA to stop the approval of mifepristone is a contentious issue that has raised concerns on both sides of the aisle.
While there are serious questions about the court’s decision, ignoring court rulings that politicians disagree with could be dangerous and undermines the rule of law.
It’s important to follow the proper legal channels to challenge court rulings, whether through appeals or working to elect politicians who share your values. The issue is headed for the highest court, and it will be interesting to see how it plays out.
Source https://www.foxnews.com/media/aoc-other-pro-choicers-want-ignore-court-ruling-blocking-abortion-pill